(Stage-wise | Section-wise | Strategy-wise)
CORE PRINCIPLE (Very Important)
You do NOT argue randomly in a criminal case.
Arguments are made ONLY at legally permitted stages.
Wrong timing = weak defence.
STAGE-WISE ARGUMENTS IN A CRIMINAL TRIAL
1. At the Stage of FIR / Investigation
❌ No detailed arguments
✅ Limited submissions only
Sections
- Section 41 CrPC / 35 BNSS – Arrest
- Section 41A CrPC / 35(3) BNSS – Notice of appearance
- Section 482 CrPC / 528 BNSS – Quashing (HC)
What to argue?
- No cognizable offence
- Civil dispute given criminal colour
- Abuse of process
Example
FIR alleges cheating, but dispute is contractual → move quashing, not trial argument.
2. At the Time of Bail
✅ FULL ARGUMENTS ALLOWED
Sections
- 437 CrPC / 480 BNSS – Magistrate bail
- 438 CrPC / 482 BNSS – Anticipatory bail
- 439 CrPC / 483 BNSS – Sessions / HC bail
What to argue?
- False implication
- No recovery pending
- Custodial interrogation not required
- Clean antecedents
Example
“Investigation is complete, charge-sheet filed, hence no purpose of further custody.”
3. At the Stage of Cognizance
❌ No defence arguments on merits
Sections
- Section 190 CrPC / 210 BNSS
What CAN be argued?
- Lack of sanction
- Bar of limitation
- Jurisdiction issue
🚫 Cannot argue innocence here
4. At the Stage of Discharge ⭐ (VERY IMPORTANT)
✅ MOST CRUCIAL ARGUMENT STAGE
Sections
- 239 CrPC / 262 BNSS – Warrant case (Police report)
- 227 CrPC / 250 BNSS – Sessions case
What to argue?
- No prima facie case
- Ingredients of offence missing
- Entire case based on suspicion
- Documentary defence
Example (376 case)
“Relationship admitted, consensual, no false promise at inception → no offence made out.”
Strong discharge = case ends early
5. At the Stage of Framing of Charge
✅ LIMITED ARGUMENTS
Sections
- 240 CrPC / 263 BNSS
- 228 CrPC / 251 BNSS
Scope
- Whether charge is groundless
- Whether offence made out on record
🚫 No cross-examination or deep analysis
6. During Prosecution Evidence
❌ No final arguments
✅ Objections + Cross-examination
Sections
- 231 CrPC / 254 BNSS
What to do?
- Break prosecution story
- Expose contradictions
- Mark contradictions u/s 145 Evidence Act
Example
Victim says incident at 8 PM, PCR call shows 11 PM → credibility shaken.
7. At Statement of Accused
❌ No arguments
Section
- 313 CrPC / 356 BNSS
Accused explains circumstances
Silence cannot be used against accused
8. At Defence Evidence (Optional)
❌ No arguments yet
Sections
- 233 CrPC / 256 BNSS
Defence proves alibi, chats, documents
9. FINAL ARGUMENTS ⭐⭐⭐
✅ MOST DETAILED & DECISIVE STAGE
Sections
- 314 CrPC / 337 BNSS
What to argue?
- Entire evidence appreciation
- Contradictions
- Benefit of doubt
- Failure of prosecution
- Law + facts + precedents
Example (376 IPC)
“Medical report negative, delay unexplained, WhatsApp chats show voluntary relationship — prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.”
10. Written Submissions
📌 Section
- 314(2) CrPC / 337 BNSS
✔️ Helpful in complex cases
✔️ Mandatory in many Delhi courts
QUICK MEMORY TABLE
| Stage | Argue? | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| FIR stage | ❌ | Only quashing |
| Bail | ✅ | Liberty |
| Cognizance | ❌ | Technical only |
| Discharge | ✅⭐ | Case end |
| Charge | ⚠️ Limited | Prima facie |
| Evidence | ❌ | Only cross |
| 313 | ❌ | Explanation |
| Defence | ❌ | Proof |
| Final arguments | ✅⭐⭐⭐ | Acquittal |
GOLDEN RULE (Court Wisdom)
Argue law at discharge,
facts during trial,
and law + facts together at final arguments.
One-Line Court-Ready Submission
“At this stage, this Hon’ble Court is only required to see whether the essential ingredients of the alleged offence are made out, which are completely absent in the present case.”
FINAL TAKEAWAY
- Wrong stage = wasted argument
- Discharge & Final arguments decide fate
- Cross-examination builds final arguments
Our Linkedin
https://www.linkedin.com/in/ushavats/


Add a Comment