1. CIVIL LAW
Meaning:
Civil law deals with disputes between individuals, organizations, or both, where one party seeks compensation or enforcement of rights rather than punishment.
Objective:
To protect the private rights of individuals and provide relief or compensation to the aggrieved party.
Examples:
- Breach of contract
- Property disputes
- Divorce or maintenance cases
- Partition suits
- Recovery of money
Legal Provisions:
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)
- Indian Contract Act, 1872
- Specific Relief Act, 1963
- Transfer of Property Act, 1882
Procedure:
- Filing of plaint by plaintiff.
- Summons to defendant.
- Written statement by defendant.
- Framing of issues.
- Evidence and arguments.
- Judgment and decree.
Standard of Proof:
Preponderance of probabilities — means the version which seems more likely to be true.
Remedy:
- Compensation
- Injunction
- Declaration
- Specific performance
Landmark Case Laws:
- Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) 4 SCC 225 — Defined the basic structure doctrine in constitutional interpretation (civil rights).
- Hadley v. Baxendale (1854) 9 Exch 341 — Classic case on breach of contract and damages.
- Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) 1 SCC 248 — Civil liberty case expanding Article 21.
2. CRIMINAL LAW
Meaning:
Criminal law deals with offences against the State or society and prescribes punishments for offenders.
Objective:
To maintain law and order, ensure public safety, and punish wrongdoers.
Examples:
- Murder (Sec. 302 IPC)
- Theft (Sec. 379 IPC)
- Rape (Sec. 376 IPC)
- Cheating (Sec. 420 IPC)
- Assault (Sec. 351 IPC)
Legal Provisions:
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 (replacing IPC, 1860)
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 (replacing CrPC, 1973)
- Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 (replacing Indian Evidence Act, 1872)
Procedure:
- FIR registration (Sec. 154 CrPC/BNSS).
- Investigation and charge sheet.
- Framing of charges.
- Trial and evidence.
- Judgment: conviction or acquittal.
Standard of Proof:
Beyond reasonable doubt.
Remedy:
- Imprisonment
- Fine
- Death penalty (in rare cases)
- Probation or community service
Landmark Case Laws:
- State of U.P. v. Ram Swarup (1974) 4 SCC 764 — Defined murder vs. culpable homicide distinction.
- State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992 Supp (1) SCC 335) — Guidelines for quashing FIRs under Section 482 CrPC.
- Lalita Kumari v. Govt. of U.P. (2014) 2 SCC 1 — Mandatory registration of FIR in cognizable offences.
3. CORPORATE LAW (Company/Business Law)
Meaning:
Corporate law governs the formation, management, and regulation of companies and their dealings with stakeholders, shareholders, and the public.
Objective:
To regulate business entities, ensure corporate governance, protect shareholders’ interests, and maintain fair trade practices.
Examples:
- Incorporation of a company
- Mergers and acquisitions
- Corporate fraud or insider trading
- Corporate compliance and governance issues
Legal Provisions:
- Companies Act, 2013
- Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008
- SEBI Act, 1992
- Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016
Procedure (for disputes):
- File case before NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal).
- Appeal to NCLAT.
- Further appeal to Supreme Court.
Standard of Proof:
Preponderance of probabilities (similar to civil standard).
Remedy:
- Corporate restructuring
- Liquidation or insolvency resolution
- Compensation to shareholders
- Penal action for fraud or non-compliance
Landmark Case Laws:
- Tata Consultancy Services v. Cyrus Investments Pvt. Ltd. (2021) 9 SCC 449 — Landmark on corporate governance and minority shareholder rights.
- Vodafone International Holdings BV v. Union of India (2012) 6 SCC 613 — Landmark case on taxation of offshore transactions.
- Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India (2019) 4 SCC 17 — Upheld the constitutional validity of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC).
COMPARATIVE SUMMARY TABLE
| Feature | Civil Law | Criminal Law | Corporate Law |
| Nature of wrong | Private wrong | Public wrong | Commercial or organizational wrong |
| Objective | Compensation / relief | Punishment / deterrence | Regulation of business and compliance |
| Parties involved | Plaintiff vs. Defendant | State vs. Accused | Company vs. Shareholders / Regulatory body |
| Legal basis | CPC, Contract Act, etc. | IPC/BNS, CrPC/BNSS | Companies Act, IBC, SEBI Act |
| Standard of proof | Preponderance of probability | Beyond reasonable doubt | Preponderance of probability |
| Outcome | Compensation / injunction | Punishment / fine / imprisonment | Regulation / restructuring / penalty |
| Forum | Civil Courts / District Courts | Criminal Courts / Sessions Courts | NCLT, NCLAT, SEBI, High Court |
| Appeal | Higher Civil Courts / HC / SC | Higher Criminal Courts / HC / SC | NCLAT / SC |
| Example Case | Hadley v. Baxendale | Lalita Kumari v. U.P. | TCS v. Cyrus Investments |
Conclusion
- Civil Law protects private rights and aims for compensation.
- Criminal Law protects society and seeks punishment for wrongdoers.
- Corporate Law ensures orderly business conduct, transparency, and shareholder protection.
Together, these three pillars maintain justice, order, and economic stability in society.
Difference Between Civil, Criminal, and Corporate Law Table
| Basis | Civil Law | Criminal Law | Corporate Law |
| Meaning | Civil law deals with disputes between individuals, organizations, or both, where compensation may be awarded to the victim. | Criminal law deals with offenses against the state or society, prescribing punishment for the wrongdoer. | Corporate law governs the formation, operation, and regulation of companies and corporate entities. |
| Objective | To resolve private disputes and provide compensation or specific performance. | To punish the offender and maintain law and order. | To ensure legal compliance, corporate governance, and protect shareholders’ interests. |
| Parties Involved | Plaintiff vs. Defendant | State (Prosecution) vs. Accused | Company, shareholders, directors, regulators (like MCA, SEBI) |
| Burden of Proof | “Preponderance of probabilities” (balance of evidence) | “Beyond reasonable doubt” | Based on corporate statutes and documentary compliance |
| Governing Law | Civil Procedure Code (CPC), 1908 | Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC), 1973 and Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 | Companies Act, 2013; SEBI Act, FEMA, Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code (IBC), etc. |
| Nature of Wrong | Private wrong | Public wrong | Statutory or regulatory wrong |
| Examples | Breach of contract, property disputes, matrimonial disputes, torts | Murder, theft, assault, fraud | Incorporation, mergers, director’s duties, shareholder rights |
| Outcome / Remedy | Compensation, injunction, specific performance | Imprisonment, fine, or both | Compliance orders, penalties, winding up, restructuring |
| Court Jurisdiction | Civil Courts, Family Courts, Consumer Forums | Criminal Courts, Sessions Courts, High Court | NCLT, NCLAT, SEBI, High Court, Supreme Court |
| Procedure | Governed by CPC; focuses on evidence and documents | Governed by CrPC; focuses on investigation and trial | Governed by Companies Act & NCLT Rules |
| Appeal | Appeal lies to District Court/High Court | Appeal lies to Sessions Court/High Court | Appeal lies to NCLAT/Supreme Court |
Landmark Case Laws
Civil Law Cases
- Keshavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973)
Held: The Constitution’s basic structure cannot be altered by Parliament.
Principle: Protects citizens’ fundamental rights and property rights. - Hadley v. Baxendale (1854)
Held: Damages in contract law must be foreseeable.
Principle: Basis for assessing compensation in breach of contract cases. - Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan (1997)
Held: Established guidelines for preventing sexual harassment at workplaces.
Principle: Protection of women’s rights under civil and constitutional law.
Criminal Law Cases
- State of Rajasthan v. Kashi Ram (2006)
Held: Burden of proof in criminal cases lies entirely on the prosecution.
Principle: Accused presumed innocent until proven guilty. - Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978)
Held: Expanded the scope of Article 21 (Right to Life and Liberty).
Principle: Fair trial and due process are essential components of criminal justice. - State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal (1992)
Held: Laid down guidelines for quashing FIRs under Section 482 CrPC.
Principle: Prevents misuse of criminal proceedings.
Corporate Law Cases
- Salomon v. Salomon & Co. Ltd. (1897)
Held: Company has a separate legal entity from its shareholders.
Principle: Foundation of corporate personality. - Tata Consultancy Services v. State of Andhra Pradesh (2004)
Held: Software can be treated as “goods” for taxation.
Principle: Defines corporate transactions under tax and commercial law. - PNB v. Mehul Choksi (2018)
Held: Strengthened the role of IBC and enforcement agencies in financial frauds.
Principle: Corporate accountability and creditor protection.
Summary Chart
| Aspect | Civil Law | Criminal Law | Corporate Law |
| Nature | Compensatory | Punitive | Regulatory |
| Aim | Private justice | Public justice | Corporate governance |
| Remedy | Damages/relief | Punishment | Compliance/penalty |
| Example | Contract dispute | Theft, murder | Merger, fraud |
| Authority | Civil Courts | Criminal Courts | NCLT, SEBI, MCA |
Conclusion
Civil, Criminal, and Corporate laws are three major branches of the Indian legal system:
- Civil law protects individual rights.
- Criminal law ensures societal order and justice.
- Corporate law governs commercial entities and business compliance.
Together, they form a comprehensive legal framework ensuring justice, accountability, and economic discipline.
Add a Comment