Preparation & Legal Grounds
Summary:
The petitioner must identify which fundamental or legal right is violated. Proper documents, affidavits, and annexures are prepared.
Example:
A government officer is transferred as punishment without reason → violation of Article 14.
Judgment:
D.K. Basu v. State of West Bengal (1997) → Court stressed that violation of fundamental rights justifies writ jurisdiction.
2️. Filing of the Writ Petition
Summary:
Petition is filed along with index, synopsis, affidavit, vakalatnama, annexures, and court fees.
Example:
Writ of Mandamus seeking direction to police to register FIR.
Judgment:
Lalita Kumari v. State of U.P. (2013) → Mandatory registration of FIR for cognizable offence.
3️. Admission / Preliminary Hearing
Summary:
Court checks whether the petition has merit and falls under writ jurisdiction.
Court may:
- Issue Notice
- Dismiss the petition
- Give interim relief
Example:
High Court stays demolition notice on first hearing.
Judgment:
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Visheshwar (1995) → Admission stage is for prima-facie assessment.
4️. Issue of Notice to Respondents
Summary:
Court sends notice to government department/authority to file their reply.
Example:
Municipal Corporation is asked to explain illegal sealing order.
Judgment:
A.K. Kraipak v. Union of India (1969) → Principles of natural justice mandatory.
5️. Filing of Counter-Affidavit by Respondents
Summary:
Government department explains its actions with records.
Example:
Police files reply showing reasons for inaction or delay.
Judgment:
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) → Government must justify actions affecting personal liberty.
6️. Filing of Rejoinder by Petitioner
Summary:
Petitioner rebuts the government’s reply and clarifies facts.
Example:
Petitioner denies allegations about incomplete documents.
Judgment:
S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981) → Transparency & counter replies essential for fair hearing.
7️. Final Arguments
Summary:
Both sides argue law, judgments, rights violations, and factual issues.
Example:
Petitioner argues that the transfer order is mala fide and violates Article 14.
Judgment:
R.D. Shetty v. International Airport Authority (1979) → Administrative actions must be fair and non-arbitrary.
8️. Final Order / Judgment
Summary:
Court passes final orders:
- Allow the petition
- Dismiss it
- Give directions
- Order compensation
- Transfer case to another authority
Example:
HC directs the university to declare withheld exam results within 7 days.
Judgment:
Nilabati Behera v. State of Orissa (1993) → Compensation for violation of fundamental rights.
9️. Review / Appeal (If applicable)
Summary:
Aggrieved party can file:
- Review Petition – same court
- SLP (Special Leave Petition) – Supreme Court under Article 136
Judgment:
P. Nalla Thampy Thera v. Union of India (1983) → Review permissible only on error apparent on record.
Summary Chart
| Stage | What Happens | Example | Landmark Case |
| 1. Grounds | Rights violation identified | Illegal transfer | D.K. Basu |
| 2. Filing | Petition filed with documents | Mandamus for FIR | Lalita Kumari |
| 3. Admission | Court checks merit | Interim stay | Visheshwar |
| 4. Notice | Govt notified | Sealing case | A.K. Kraipak |
| 5. Counter | Govt reply | Police explains delay | Maneka Gandhi |
| 6. Rejoinder | Petitioner rebuts | Denial of allegations | S.P. Gupta |
| 7. Arguments | Final hearing | Arbitrary action | R.D. Shetty |
| 8. Judgment | Final order | Exam results | Nilabati Behera |
| 9. Review/SLP | Appeal | Error | Nalla Thampy |


Add a Comment